![]() |
|
Spaces home Vikram's spacePhotosProfileFriends | ![]() |
|
|
October 26 ASAP Architect WinnerIt was a fantastic experience working with Architects from various parter organizations delivering the ASAP webcasts. It was quite hectic for me as well as other partner speakers but it was more hectice for the participants as they had to shell out 6 hrs per week. Hope the next ASAP series would have a lengthier timeframe.
The Winner for the Architect Contest is :-
Jayakumar.V from Cognizant
Architect
The Case Study URL for the ASAP Program is :- http://www.codeplex.com/EAppointments
The webcasts are available on the site :- http://www.microsoft.com/india/webcasts/ondemand.aspx
October 08 TATA Indicom Bridge for ASAP Series
October 01 ASAP Architecture Contest Case StudyThe Architecture Contest for ASAP.
I. The Context Event Management is a multi-million dollar industry, growing rapidly, with mega shows and events hosted regularly. Surprisingly, there are few software applications available to support this business.
Among other capabilities, the software should support the target participant needs, logistic planning and coordination of multiple service vendors.
Event Management extends to a broad category of events – from the mega-events (Olympic Games) to average sized student gatherings (Techfest at IIT-Mumbai). This problem statement focuses on large events that would cover 5000+ participants spread over multiple days. Some examples include the India Intl Trade Fair (IITF, Pragati Maidan) or a Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference.
II. The Problem The event must support out-of-town speakers and participants. The event will be attended by paying delegates (for specific seminars) as well as general public. The software must support the needs of the following “Actors” & Scenarios
Actors
Scenarios The scenarios the software must support are: 1. Trip & schedule planning for speakers (logistic support) 2. Local transportation for paying delegates 3. Delegate registration and tracking 4. Enhance networking opportunities & mechanisms (technology as an enabler tool) 5. Support and assistance (Electronic “concierge”)
III. Some Ideas 1. Feedback, Opinion Services: Participants can provide real-time feedback, insights about a seminar, speaker using Pocket PC’s. Such feedback could help other participants to choose seminars, or speakers to modify their presentation to suit the audience. (Need Fulfilled: More effective use of participant & speaker time) 2. People Matching Services: Based on the input profile & feedback provided by individuals, the system could match potentially like-minded persons. (Need Fulfilled: Networking) 3. Recommendation Services: The system could suggest sessions, meetings, local attractions, etc, based on personal preference & feedback provided (similar to Amazon.com’s “Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought” feature). (Need Fulfilled: Participant Value) 4. Invitation Services: Instant (event specific) blogs. Services that help individuals invite other like-minded individuals for get-togethers, dinner meetings, etc. (Need Fulfilled: Networking)
IV. Guidelines & Assumptions 1. The intent of this Case Study is to focus on the high-level functional & technical architecture 2. The proposed solution must be practical and deployable using existing Microsoft products and off-the-shelf hardware. 3. Assume: the event organization has a significant use of information technology (Kiosks, Displays, WiFi cloud, etc) 4. Assume: all participants have WiFi enabled PocketPC’s (or Smartphone)
V. Our Evaluation Criteria The software tool will be evaluated on the following criteria 1. Clarity: Clear communication of architectural vision that satisfies the needs to event organizers (project sponsors) 2. Practical: Solution to be implemented within the next 3-6 months. 3. Simplicity: Reduces execution risk 4. Innovation: Imagine, Think Different. 5. Approach: The thinking behind the proposal. What other alternatives did you consider before closing on the final proposal.
VI. Deliverables 1. Mandatory:
2. Discretionary:
3. Extra Credits: (for your Thoughts)
VII. Resources 1. MSDN Architecture Center – http://msdn.microsoft.com/architecture/ 2. Microsoft Patterns & Practices - http://msdn.microsoft.com/practices/ 3. Microsoft.NET 3.0 Framework Community – http://www.netfx3.com/
mail to:- vikramr@microsoft.com February 03 Talking about TCS, World's best IT Service Provider
Quote TCS, World's best IT Service Provider |
|
|